Channeling Erik

January3rd

14 Comments

Back from a cozy time in Norway. You may have noticed from my responses to comments that my brain is not altogether there. Some were very short, most were a little confused. Sucks when your baseline brain function in nominal! Anyway, when I went to bed last night, we found out that our heater was broken, and the temperature here in Houston at the time was in the high 30s, low 40s. Even under my thick comforter I was so friggin cold and my toes were like little ice cubes. I couldn’t believe I felt warmer in Norway than in Houston. Irony. Anyway, before I share the transcription on the nature of matter and reality, let me give you some background on the two theories I asked Erik about. Given my mental status and jet lag, the timing of this subject’s complexity is amazing.

Two Theories on Matter

Wave Structure of Matter: All matter comes from spherical standing waves. A standing wave is a wave that may be thought of as two waves traveling in opposite directions. For a particle, this means an incoming wave converges into the center and an outgoing wave comes out of the center, which is just the incoming wave after it travels through the center. Here’s a short video to explain things better.

Vortex Theory: Space is made of something. Matter is made of nothing. Protons, electrons, neutrons, are really holes in space. In 4-D space, protons and electrons are connected by a vortex of 3-D space. The vortex begins as space flows into the proton, then out of it and into 4-D space, then back into the electron where it emerges into 3-D space. A second vortex flows from the electron to the proton in 3-D space, creating the hydrogen atom. These two vortices (one if 3-D, one in 4-D) create a circulating flow containing a fixed volume of space. This circulating volume of 3-D space continually flows from the proton into the 4-D space and then into the electron. Then the electron flows back into 3-D space and into the proton again. All the atoms have vortices connecting the protons and electrons in the periodic table. Stated simply: everything is made of only one thing: space. There is only space and motion. The only thing that exists in the physical universe is the substance of which space is made. Space is not an empty void. It’s a multidimensional substance that everything in the 3-D universe is made of. Matter is energy in motion. When energy moves in a vortex, it gains stability and form. This energy generates time and space. Every vortex has an energy field which creates time and space. So T and S is not external and between things. They are emerging fields from things. When two vortices meet, they create a third vortex which is sensitive to incoming energies: creation. DNA is a model of two vortices meeting. Here’s a video explaining this concept:

Channeling Transcript

Kim: So Elisa, where shall we begin today?

Me: Well, first, I’d like to say hello to my little boy, if he’s there.

Kim (laughing): He’s like, “Whaddya mean, if I’m here!”

Erik: Hey Mom.

Me: Hey Baby. I’m gonna start with a heavy duty one here, so brace yourself.

Erik: “Kay. Bring it on.

Me: I’ve been reading about the physics behind reality, etc, and there are two fascinating theories in particular. One is the Vortex Theory and the other is the Wave Structure of Matter Theory.  Now the Wave Structure of Matter Theory says that all matter comes from spherical standing waves. It’s all waves; everything is waves, I guess. The Vortex Theory is similar, but says that electrons, protons, and neutrons are just holes in space and that there are two vortices. The vortex begins as space flows through the hole that is the proton, then out of it into 4-D space, then back into the electron which is in 3-D space. Basically, this flowing between vortices creates matter. I guess there are infinite vortices, of course. Anyway, are any of these, right? In other words, is it the Wave Structure of Matter Theory or the Vortex theory or neither?

Erik: I knew you were going to ask this question, of course, so I had to find some help. Must of missed that lecture in physics class. (He chuckles.) Um, they tell me the Vortex Theory is more elementary, like on a micro scale or something. And, uh, the Wave Structure of Matter Theory is like the bigger picture. Those waves are all vortex based.

Me: So are they pretty much the same thing, but on different levels? Do they agree with each other?

Erik: Well, not totally. The Vortex Theory says that things remain pretty much the same, like two plus two is always gonna equal four. Sure there is flow in and out of these holes in space, but there’s really more to it; things are more fluid. Now, with the Wave Structure of Matter Theory, things are always shifting and in flux. That’s much more in keeping with how the universe is structured.

Me: Are there any parts of the Vortex Theory that are correct?

Erik: Sure, but on an earthly level.

Me: Oh, okay.

Erik: But on a spiritual level, it’s too static to represent the constant changes and shift of the whole picture.

Me: So are all other dimensions created or made from the same stuff whatever it is?

Kim: You mean the spiritual dimension, the earthly dimension?

Me: I guess all of them.

Erik: Yes, all created by the same matter. But Mom, these are such hard questions, because even though the physicists are on the right track, they still think two plus two is four. All that linear and sequential crap gets in the way here. All I can say is that it’s about waves shifting in and out of different dimensions, like flickering in and out of existence: through white holes, black holes, white holes, black holes. Everything flows from creation to stability, creation, stability. That’s really all I know, Mom.

Me: Well good, because I don’t think my brain can take much more!

Erik laughs.

Erik: Oh, and I hear that all this change and this flickering has something to do with the Universe learning and experimenting, so that should really blow a gasket in your mind!

Me: Oh, God!

I have a session with Jamie tomorrow, so I’ll see if Erik has found out any more information on the subject! Glad to be back! Love you all!

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Paul Conklin

    Dear Elisa,

    Maybe Erik can answer a question that I have. If waves flicker in and out from one dimension to another, white holes, black holes, flowing from creation to stability, can there be a computer analogy?

    Every letter on a computer is made of eight bits. I don’t know what the letter A is, but I will just throw something out there as an example. Let’s say that the letter A is on, off, on, off, on, off, on, off. From what I understand the computer recognizes, at the machine code level this sequential representation as the letter A. So, the circuit would flash on and off four times in sequence. That would be the letter A. The sequence for letter B would be another series of eight bits in a slightly different configuration and so on.

    Is the nature of reality like waves that turn off and on in a particular sequence? Does that mean that reality is like a river that flows around bends, twisting and turning, following the contours of the river bank? Do these energetic waves of reality respond to input?

    In other words the nature of an electron is affected by drawing our attention to it. If we view the electron as a particle, it becomes a particle. If we view the electron as a wave it becomes a wave.

    Erik, is the nature of reality affected by our free will? Does our will, our attention upon something change its very nature? Does the energetic waves of reality flow from the Father in Paradise through the channels of space? Do these channels of space flow in and out of many dimensions until they reside in our dimension?

    This is what a professor says Erik:

    The Wave Structure of Matter – How Waves form ‘Particles’

    The Wave Structure of fundamental Particles evolved over five years. It began with a simple speculation that waves in Space could explain the de Broglie wavelength. It continued to agree with more laws and observations than I first expected and I was amazed. The ‘Particle’ is two identical spherical waves travelling radially in opposite directions so that together they form a spherical standing wave. The wave which travels inward towards the center is called an In-Wave, and the wave travelling outward is an Out-Wave. The nominal location of the ‘Particle’ is the Wave-Center, but as must be true for any charged Particle, it has presence everywhere in Space because the charge forces extend throughout the Universe.”

    I know that is a tall order, but I am sure that your many physics friends will be lining up to beat down the door of our dimension and provide the answers. Hey Erik, ya probably thought that school was outta session. No such luck buddy. (wink)

    Love,
    Paul

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Dang, Paul, my brain just had its last agonal breath and died. I’ll put this on the list, but Erik might come to haunt you with some pranks just to get back at you! (grin)

  • Paul Conklin

    Dear Elisa,

    LOL. Thanks for the heads up. I better get ready for the onslaught.

    Love,
    Paul

  • Skoshi

    Elisa, my guides have told me that NONE of the theories are 100% correct, and in any event, what is true on earth isn’t necessarily true elsewhere.

    Glad you’ve arrived home safely and you didn’t get stuck at some airport. I can relate to your cold toes. I had pipes burst at the house in NY in the middle of winter and in the middle of the night a couple of years ago and had to wait till morning to call for help/repairs. I was waaaay too cold to sleep, even with multiple down comforters and jacket and gloves! We really would be a mess if society collapsed, wouldn’t we?! My ex- tried winter camping with expensive winter camping gear in the Adirondacks many years ago…where it goes to 30 below at the drop of a hat. He said you never feel comfortable or that you could eat enough gorp to get warm.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Yeah, but it’s fun to torture my husband with my icicle toes under the covers.

  • Danielle Notaro

    Waat is it with heaters this past weekend?? Norway. Houston. And here! I thought the furnace in my building was going to explode in the wee hrs. of Fri-Sat morning.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      I know, Danielle! Mercury is not in retrograde still, so…????

  • Michelle Cosgrave

    Ok now my head aches LOL
    xx

  • Skoshi

    Given the discussion about numbers the other day, I thought some of you might find interesting that today Neil Spencer posted a column about “year numbers” in astrology:

    http://www.neilspencer.co.uk/

  • Skoshi

    Uuu, uuu! Even more interesting…in the neilspencer site, I found an article re the Mayan calendar, and on that same site, there’s an article about “junk” DNA. It’s the kind of stuff I’m reading in “DNA Demystified”, which my guides recommended I read. See what you think of this:

    http://www.nightfall-project.com/dna.html

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Cool, Skoshi! I wonder if activation of the “junk” DNA is part of the Awakening plan/movement.

  • steve

    When mercury was in retrograde my pipes froze in atlanta a few weeks ago.

  • Be Free My Angel

    Love the name of the post!!!!

  • http://www.supernaturalsenisitives.com kathy

    When we overthink we are so off target from the truth. What ever we feel is correct… is correct. What ever is… just is and always was and always will be. We feel so restrained that we need to keep thinking to understand what is not permanent….. separating us from the truth of knowing the secrets of the universe that would free us to know the all knowing mind. We are all and nothing at the same time.