Channeling Erik

March19th

25 Comments

Paul C. turned me on to this brilliant physicist, Nassim Haramein, who explains reality and unified fields in a way that is understandable plus highly entertaining. In fact, the guy is hilarious! He sounds like surfer dude, meets Cheech and Chong, meets Einstein! You have to listen to all parts because it builds slowly to a supreme understanding of, well, everything. You’ll never look at life and reality in the same way again, and you’ll find that your problems seem to shrink into nothingness.

Also, please enjoy the jaw-dropping sacred geometry artwork of blog member, Endre Balogh, at the end of this post.

Sacred Geometry

Enjoy more of Endre’s art at:
http://www.endresphotos.com/-/endresphotos/galleryindex.asp

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • http://lovealfine.tumblr.com Alfine

    He is SOOOO funny! Lol

    So much entertainment for my Saturday evening!

    Thanks for sharing :)

  • Skoshi

    Good stuff, huh? Drunvalo Melchizedek has books about this and is on youtube with the stuff too.

  • Skoshi

    re Chinese Medicine

    Elisa, by the way this was my doctor in Annapolis:

    http://www.wellness.com/dir/2189198/internist/md/annapolis/margaret-mullins-acupuncture-associates-md

    She retired, unfortunately. She was FABULOUS. She told me she wrote an article about my case that was published in a medical journal. I don’t know if you have access to a medical library’s site and can pull it up. I was at the NIH’s library in Bethesda one day many years ago and couldn’t find it. I wonder if it was in an acupuncture journal or other non-mainstream journal? It was Doctor Mullins who had Bob Clickner in her office doing Reiki; he’s the practitioner who moved my teeth with Reiki.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Too bad she retired. How old is she? Is she doing anything else? I’ll do a search and see if I find anything.

  • George

    You may have damaged your image with this published association with Nassim Haramein. Please do more research. You have people who will blindly follow your lead. I realize that’s their problem and not yours but in this case you may have done yourself and your son’s memory a disservice.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Why? I know he has been surrounded by some controversy, but those with new bold ideas often are attacked. Otherwise, you’re correct in that I do not know much about the man, himself. I think the lesson here is to focus on the ideas, the information, not the messenger. And Robert has actually channeled this exactly same information about the unified field: infinitely large/infinitely small, even before I came across these videos. So if I were to google more about Nassim and found out horrible things about him, it wouldn’t detract from the theories he expresses. They’re probably all channeled anyway!

  • Skoshi

    She was elderly when I was her patient back in ’02. I’ll have to send an email to Robert Clickner, I bet he knows if she’s still alive. He has a practice near Charlottesville, VA since she retired.

  • Amy J.

    Hi Elisa,

    Very well said about George’s comment. You will never and I mean never do your son or you a Disservice by putting out information that people will read. We all have an opinion and we all make mistakes and we all can take or leave any information they feel not to be true. And if someone tells someone to jump off a bridge and they do it..well then that’s their problem not yours. You could never, in my eyes damage your image. You are a wonder sweet woman that is helping not only yourself heal and become stronger but giving others the love of words to understand the heartache,grief and maybe a beautiful light that is out there waiting for us. Love you for your beautiful heart and your love of sharing to all of us.
    Now remember….it’s only my opinion. :) LOL

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      LOL, Amy J.! I believe George’s comment probably reflects the sentiments of a majority of people. I’m not sure if George is upset by Nassim’s theories or something else like his personal life, political views, etc. New ideas are often met with fear and resistance. Take Einstein. He had wonderful ideas and we’ve adopted many of them into popular science, but were all of his ideas good or true? Of course not. Was he a perfect man? No! He was a big womanizer, for instance. I think (but I’m not sure so don’t quote me) he cheated on his wife a few times, but does that mean I cast his work aside as bogus? No. So maybe, like I said, this is our opportunity to learn something valuable: We must judge ideas for ourselves and not color our opinions with unrelated silliness. Consider the message without shooting the messenger.

  • Skoshi

    I got an Einstein biography on CD out of the library to listen to on a long car trip. He was so cruel to his first wife that I was crying listening to it. What is known of their relationship is revealed in letters. He lived with her for years and wouldn’t marry her. They had a daughter, and he made her give the girl away. They later married and had 2 sons, and he left her for his young cousin, whom he had been having an affair with for years (she was a young teen) and later married. He was frustrated for many years before he died because he couldn’t come up with a formula to prove his theories. Some scientists now say his theories put science back 100 years.

    The criticism of Nassim Haramein on the web is that he is not an academic. He repeatedly says he is not an academic, so that’s no revelation. I found a scientist who criticizes his work, but he repeatedly says in the videos that scientists dispute his work.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      Oh, good, so it’s not like he’s a meth addict or anything. Thank God! What do you think about his unified field theory?

  • JoAnn Nichols

    I love his theory and I myself am not an academic at all,,,and I can say honestly and true to my self as one as all that I can add something to his theory that even he did not see himself(or mention b/c there can be no mathematical proof) but I wrote one of my earlier post on the subject i beleieve and if not i meant to. but i had communication with something some yrs ago and was asked if I wanted to learn the secret to the universe,after I was told a very simple piece of information. It is that information that I wanted to add to Nassims’ theory. I was told that there are positive and negative forces at work at all times. and that some examples of negative forces are man-made items and humans and that some examples of positive forces are animals and nature, tree’s etc. I was specifically told that I am neutral. Well after watching the videos I gained an enlightenment about that entire experience. I want to apologize in advance for my lack of academic knowledge which i am lacking. I only ever completed the 8th grade in school and at age 20 took my GED and passed. most of my writing and knowledge is from listening to and/ or through my higher-self. Nassim explains alot of math and psychics that I have no knowledge of but I learned all that he was trying to teach us.He made the comment that “we” have never touched anything ever!!and that nothing has touched anything else ever. well I gather from what he said that it is because everything has space in between it and in order for 2 objects to touch you would need an infinite (strong) force pushing each against the other to Force the objects to overpower the density that is space. Well my theory is that when the information i was given, stating that I am neutral, that the “I” in the statement is referring to my soul,our souls not human flesh. So : here goes…. our souls are neutral energy and therefore can touch /combine/collect-ive, I believe that the energy that is our core being,,,must be the only energy in existense (one-is-all , GOD is -all ) as the Collective conscious. And so combined it must be the only energy/force that can be “omni-essense” (dont know what that means) The alpha and the omega…It rings true to my heart that this is the secret to the unbiverse b/c GOD must have something that no other energy force has and since he created “US” in his image,,,that “WE” are a part of himself and therefore combined equals energy beyond our understanding,,,,Erik talks about going back to source(GOD),,,so even in heaven (dimensions) the souls there are still tenacles seperated form source if they so choose to be …the same as we are here in our earthly experience,,,i believe that once combined totally ,which must be done in my opinion: in order for “source to be whole and generate the amount of energy needed to “CREATE” a “New Heaven and a New earth” becaus ei all the writing in the bible the end result or the climax is the creation of the new heaven and the new eath for us to be once again “trapped “inside the flesh and start LIFE anew. I always believed that in genesis where it says the eath was void and without form was a literal translation stating the simple truth that this earth was dead and all life had been destroyed from natural disasters when “GOD” came upon it in the wilderness and breathed “LIFE” anew into the seeds of every living creature here,,,,then we “The Energy That is Our Soul” were integrated into the flesh ,,,exactly like it said. scholars theisits etc always try to give new meaning to the word void when it is used in the context that hyte bible uses but That is the same thing scientist did with the theories that didnt make sense in Nassims Videos . They make it up to fir into what they want it to mean. Either way it is not the truth . The truth ias simple void means something was trhere and it got messed up so it needs to be re-done ,re-written same as in a voided check. I always wondered the magnitude of energy it would take to CREATE and entire universe and now I know what it takes: US collective and whole ,,,with focused intention at the same goal . GOD was right when he said that if every soul could join together and work for one goal there would be no limitation to what we could achieve and apparently have and will again. If anyone can understand what i am saying and think that i am not crazy please let me know your opinions ,, I believe that I am giving a message to all :inspired out of LOVE ,,,as one as all.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      JoAnn, I’ve had many many years of advanced science and math, and I consider YOU pure genius compared to me. In fact, all that science has probably done more harm for me than good, because my skepticism was a difficult hurdle to leap after Erik’s death. No teacher can compare to the teacher that is your Higher Self, and this is who you have decided to learn from, so kudos to you. I wish I was better at tapping into my Higher Self, but that comes from dedicated practice. I love the simplicity of your theory. It certainly rings very, very true. Love you girl!

  • JoAnn Nichols

    Elisa,
    Iam sorry i did not do a spell check but everytime i try to go back and fix a mistake i get the sentences all scrambled and oput oif order somehow,,,,on a personal note ,,You and Erik and all of the CE family inspire me and I thank you everyone,,,and I have no clue why George would think that the videos would hurt any of us,,,, I do not believe that for a second and I am sure no other member does either . We are here to support each other and to learn and to love and be loved. You have brought us all together for love. I have a question to ask if it would be alright to ask it here on this post, How do we join ourselves together with intent and focus and love and free our souls from inside of us to work with us on our journey from this moment in TRUTH and LIGHT?

  • Skoshi

    I’m no physicist, but what he says sounds logical, with one conclusion leading the next. I believe in the unified field from meditating AND from coming to it logically from other directions so I would be more surprised if physicists DIDN’T support a unified field than if they would.

    It occurred to me years ago that everything is made up of atoms and everything is constantly breaking down and changing and either growing or deteriorating; atoms are constantly exchanging electronics, etc. and EVERYTHING is composed of atoms and all atoms are touching; i.e. the atoms of your skin touch the atoms of the air, which touch the atoms of the furniture and your dog, etc. SO obviously EVERYTHING is connected. There is more space than material in every atom so everything is a soupy mess. No?

    Most religions and many people believe “god” or “source” or “the ground of being” is everywhere. I read years ago that someone asked, if that is so, WHERE is the “I AM”? He concluded it was in the SPACE in the atoms. That knocked me out and rang true for me. Those of us who have experienced miracles KNOW the response to our request was IMMEDIATE. How can that be otherwise?

    Whose who have “miraculous” awakening experiences (like Eckart Tolle and Adyashanti)talk about seeing that everything is fluid and One. The brilliant young woman neurologist who had the major stroke and wrote about the experience and her recovery (I should send you that book) speaks about seeing that everything is One. To me, it’s just obvious.

    I don’t think Haramein will be accepted by physicists in his lifetime. He recommends meditating. He says, “you are light”. From childhood he has questioned very elemental aspects on which modern physics is based, such as the point not being a dimension. He points out the elephant in the room: in order for there to be expansion, there has to be something MAKING things expand, drawing the lungs on the person blowing up the balloon with the coins stuck to it. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion and objects at rest tend to stay at rest. A basic. These are MAJOR sticking points modern physicists ignore because they have no solution. How unscientific!

    That program on the Science channel a week or two ago that said now professors and students in universities are acknowledging that the Big Bang theory is probably wrong…that’s HUGE! I’ve always had a problem with that and physicists have always at some level, if they’re honest with themselves, had a problem with that, because of the question: WHAT (OR WHO?) caused the bang? WHat was there before the bang? Now they’re saying everything is wavy strings and the waves bumped.

    I always come down to this: I can trust my experiences, and science has to agree with my experiences. That’s even true to scientists if they admit it. If water didn’t boil MOST OF THE TIME (not always!) at 212 degrees, agreeing with scientists’ experiences, they wouldn’t believe it.

    It occurred to me long ago, regarding the point that Haramein says is a dimension, no matter HOW small the dot, it has a circumfrence, a diameter, an inner and outer. That’s why I have no problem when Drunvalo M. talks about going inside when meditating and going in and in and in and in and in and in…we can’t imagine large enough OR small enough. Everything IS dots!

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      @ Skoshi: who were those ancient mystics that used to meditate both outwardly and inwardly? They were able to project their consciousness into another constellation of stars (before we even identified that constellation) and also inward into an atom, before we even knew about atoms.

  • Sue

    Thanks for posting the videos of Nassim Haramein. I’ve been following his work for awhile now. But I hadn’t seen those videos. I think he’s brilliant and the more he upsets the other scientists’ apple cart, the more I like him!

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      LOL, Sue, I totally agree!!

  • Skoshi

    I think all groups who meditate get to that point…the Buddhists, the Essenes, etc. Meditation leads to mystical experiences. Some Buddhist teachers say ignore “peak experiences”. I say, it’s my Self or guides or angels trying to get messages through to me; why would I ignore them?

  • JoAnn Nichols

    Thank you Elisa for believing in me,,,I am beginning to believe in myself also and I am sure going to listen to my inner self from now on and if it rings true to my heart than It is TRUTH to my heart, as me as one as all! I am soo very thank full for having you and ERIK in my life now and all the rest of the CE family too,,,,lots of love to you all.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      {{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}

  • Patrick

    Elisa: Sorry I haven’t weighed in this…..I’ve been so busy. I lot of what Nassim Haramein says explains my earlier musings on time, distance and movement and I’ll provide those formulas. Stand by…. a disservice by association with him?? HA HA HA HA, that’s the Joke of the Month!!
    His initial two dimensional drawing is a good but extremely basic schematic drawing….I’ll expand on this as best as I can with words.
    Quantum theory is right but inaccurate – it’s right within its self-imposed limits but overall inaccurate precisely because it presupposes limits that don’t exist. Since we are all trained from infancy to assume and believe in those limits, we accept the conclusions to which the theory points. Remember the word THEORY….I’ll give some descriptions and calculations. I’m a lot nuttier than Hassim; anybody that’s read my “scatalogical cerebral production” picks up on that right away.

  • Patrick

    “Nassim” !!! Not “Hassim”…sorry, bro! Or sorry “mite”…(I’ve been hearing that a lot down here)

  • BPK

    Skoshi you are wrong when you say all atoms are touching and that everything is connected. What about meteors and other planets in the non perfect vacuum that is space? They aren’t touching other atoms because space surrounds them, which we know in not made up of atoms, because it is nothing.

    • http://drmedhus.com Elisa

      I think they are connected in a certain way–maybe related to quantum entanglement. Not PHYSICALLY touching, but energetically touching.