Channeling Erik

February28th

14 Comments

Channeling Marilyn Monroe, Part Four

Posted in: Celebrities, Channeling

Me: Okay. Can you share a past life that most affected your last one, Marilyn?

Marilyn: Oh, that’s so interesting!

Me:  I get that a lot!

(Pause)

Jamie (to Marilyn): Right, right. So, that would be a different category.

Jamie (laughing): She was going back to the one as Norma Jean, and Erik was like, “No, another one. Another life.” It was cute!

(Pause)

Jamie: Uh, she’s giving me an image of being a mechanic. Older man, maybe 50s to 60s? She lived in Germany, and she was putting cars together.

Marilyn: I was not the owner, nor even the designer of the car. I was just the mechanic. I wasn’t married, really didn’t have any family, and it was the kindness of the manufacturer that recognized me as being a creative designer. He pulled me out of the field even at an older age when it wasn’t even considered appropriate to work. I was put in front of the thinkers, and I had never come across anyone in my lifetime that could see people for who they are and for that person to be so rich and in such a higher position in life.

Me: Wow.

Marilyn: I remember throughout my whole life, I worked, and now I was getting praised because somebody saw the good in me. I just wanted to be that man in that next life—to see the good in people.

Me: Yeah. What a beautiful thing to want.

Marilyn: That influenced me, because the next life I came into, I was Norma Jean, and I tried my best to see the good in people, but all I signed up for was disconnect.

Me: Yeah. Yeah. Now that you have a fresh perspective, do you have any messages to share with the world?

Marilyn: Sexy is beautiful, yet beauty only exists if there’s honesty.

Me: I like that! Honesty with others and honesty with yourself.

Marilyn: Yes. Across the board.

Me: Is there anything else you want to ask Ms. Monroe, Erik? Not her measurements, please!

Erik (laughing): Nope, just that I’m going to walk her home!

Me: Oh, I bet!

Me: Well, thank you do much, Ms. Monroe, for coming here today.

Marilyn: Thank you for having me.

Jamie: It’s cool, because she’s not that tall or than thin. She’s very much full-figured.

Me: Good! That’s the way women should be. (That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it!)

Jamie: Beautiful woman, and her skin is gorgeous!

 

 

 

 

 

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Mommazee

    “Sexy is beautiful, yet beauty only exists if there’s honesty.”
    I don’t get what she means by that. She was saying how she wasn’t honest with herself or others, that she had a lot of secrets and lies that she held, yet she was beautiful despite that, so obviously beauty can exist without honesty based on what she said and did (and how everyone else perceived her). Is she talking about body image, and being full figured (as opposed to stick thin…in the modeling industry?). What an odd message to share with the world!
    Also, I bet XXX is a Kennedy :)

    • Jason Shapeofacloud

      This is my take on your question.

      A play on words is often an appeal to one’s emotions about personal belief. Often the perceived ambiguity or confusion lays not in the one giving the message or the message it self, but in the offering to create our own meaning. Often the message is simply a catalyst for creating our own message which we then take with us.

      “Sexy is beautiful, yet beauty only exists if there’s honesty.” Sexy is a label of image and emotion, and a description of a behavior. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Beauty is more transitory, atheistic, but it too is a label, a description of a feeling. How does one see, understand, know, and express what is beautiful? How is it created. What we know and how we understand it comes from knowing and expressing who we are. The more we do so the more we can express this with intent. Do we express this intent with unconscious being? or is it dishonesty? or is it stem from expressing ourselves after honest reflection and understanding of who we are? Does form follow function or function follow form? The best compositions can come from pure feeling, yet the timeless ones often come from a deep understanding born of experience, practice and honest intent to express one’s self. True beauty is about knowing, understanding, and expressing who you are with intent. To do that. You have to be brave, and proactive. To look at yourself with honesty and not shy away from what you feel.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrick-De-Haan/641998726 Patrick De Haan

    I don’t interpret that to mean physical beauty and I don’t see much overlap of “sexy” and “beautiful”. My wife breaks the pattern; she is elegantly both.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patrick-De-Haan/641998726 Patrick De Haan

    There isn’t a past or future time but on Earth

  • http://www.channelingerik.com Elisa Medhus, MD

    Well, one thing that makes it difficult is that there is no time over there, so meshing linear time on the earthly plane with the timelessness of their dimension is not easy. Plus, even deceased can be mistaken as can any psychic. I don’t believe in editing and/or fact checking any of this. xo Elisa

  • http://bigseance.myopenid.com/ Patrick

    Erik truly does have connections. :-) When I cross over I’m definitely looking him up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1027593595 Steve Trask

    From what I’ve read via the Conv0luted Universe series, it’s possible for a soul to live multiple lives. It’s not common, but the soul can split into two completely separate lives simultaneously (be born into two different bodies). This man could have lived during the time when more of Marilyn’s “soul” entered the Norma Jean body…there could have been overlap there. It’s just a guess, but I swear I’ve read about this. I’ll email Robert and see if he can clarify this.

    • Jason Shapeofacloud

      Your correct Steve. It’s rare, something that older souls or experienced ones do from time to time. This can also happen if a facet (personality/life) gets into trouble due to their actions or beliefs and is sequestered off or exiles themselves for a time for whatever reason. The higher self or entity is not limited to incarnation or experience. It simply extends a new facet. This sort of thing becomes more prevalent when souls cojoin with groups as well. It’s more about splitting focus. We have to remember it’s the journey of consciousness, not the journey of a body.

  • Allen

    There wasn’t any reference to ‘mass production’ – just being a car builder. Cars were built starting in the late 1800′s and early 1900′s… built by craftsman from the ground-up, not on a mass production assembly line yet. It could be possible that the life referenced was of a craftmans who built the cars in that way. And even then, there had to be designers helping the craftsman to know what to build.

    I wouldn’t get hung up on it. There wasn’t a reference to assembly lines and mass-produced cars, which is where that 1920′s date came from.

  • http://www.channelingerik.com Elisa Medhus, MD

    No, but the family is. (some, anyway.)

  • http://www.channelingerik.com Elisa Medhus, MD

    It’s weird how synchronicity works. It seem like almost every time I post an interview, something about that person is on the media.

  • Tracy Lamont

    I was wondering, Elisa, could you add the question to your list about whether the interviewee has since reincarnated and could possibly be in a new body in our timeframe. I think one or two bloggies alluded to it and it’s a fascinating idea..

    • http://www.channelingerik.com Elisa Medhus, MD

      I could yes. I did that with Jesus. Thanks!

      • Mommazee

        You already interviewed Jesus? Did I miss it, or is it coming up later?

Return to the Homepage